Currently, you can see our project references and other general educational technology references.

In the near future, these references will be added to and categorized into the following categories:

• Gender and Computer Science
• Ethnic Identity Issues
• Digital Divide
• Research Methodology
• Technology & Schools

AB 64 Education Technology. Chaptered 08/19/97. http://www.cde.ca.gov/digitalhigh/AB.htm
AB 598 Assembly Bill. Chaptered 02/19/99. http://www.cde.ca.gov/ctl/ab598.htm
Amsden, A. & Clark, J.C. (1999). "Software Entrepreneurship Among The Urban Poor: Could Bill Gates Have Succeeded If He Were Black? …Or Impoverished?" In Schön, D., Sanyal, B., & Mitchell, W. (Eds.)High Technology and Low-Income Communities: P rospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Becker, H., Ravitz, J., Wong, Y. (1999). "Teaching, Learning, Computing: 1998 National Survey." Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine and University of Minnesota.
California Department of Education. (1999). Digital High School Program Application: FY 199/00 and FY 2000/01. California Department of Education Education Technology Office.
California Department of Education Educational Demographics Unit.
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ftpbranch/retdiv/demo/Demohome.html
California Department of Education and the California Technology Assistance Project (September 2001) Summary of Statewide Results from the 2001 California Technology Survey.
California Department of Education (2001). Education Technology Planning: A guide for School Districts. Commission on Technology in Learning: Sacramento, CA.
College Board. (2001). Advanced Placement Program California and National Summary Reports. College Entrance Examination Board.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Digital High School Program Application (1999). California Department of Education. Education Technology Office.
Education Week. (2002). Tracking Tech Trends. May 2002. Vol. XX1, No.35.
Kling, R. & Scacchi, W. (1982). The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. In M.C. Yovits (Ed.), Advances in computers: Vol. 21 (pp.1-90). New York: Academic Press.
Lee, V., Crogninger, R.G., Smith, J.B. (1997). Course-Taking, Equity, and Mathematics Learning: Testing the Constrained Curriculum Hypothesis in U.S. Secondary Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 19:2, 99-121.
Lee, V.E., et. al (1998). High school curriculum structure: Effects on coursetaking and achievement in mathematics for high school graduates— An examination of data from the national Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (Working Paper no. 98). Washington, DC: US Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics.
Margolis, J. & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
National Research Council, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. Being Fluent with Information Technology . (Washington, D.C. National Academy Press, 1999).
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. Yale University Press.
Oakes, J. (1989). "Tracking in mathematics and science education: A structural contribution to unequal schooling." In L. Weis (ed.), Class, race, and gender in American education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Oakes, J. (1990a). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
Oakes, J. (1990b). Opportunities, Achievement, and Choice: Women and Minority Students in Science and Mathematics. Review of Research in Education. V. 16, pp. 153-222.
Oakes, J. & Guiton, G. (1994). "Matchmaking: The Dynamics of High School Tracking Decisions." American Educational Research Journal. (32) 1, pp. 3-33.
Oakes, J. et. al.(2000). "Diversity and Coursetaking: Equity Concerns in Mathematics and Science Achievement." Paper prepared for the NISE Forum: Diversity and Equity Issues in Mathematics and Science Education: Recommendations for a Research Agenda. Detroit, 2000.
Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Cooke, S. (1999). "The Computer Clubhouse: Technological Fluency in the Inner City." In Schön, D., Sanyal, B., & Mitchell, W. High Technology and Low-Income Communities: Prospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schofield, J. W. and Davidson, A.L. (2002). Bringing the Internet to School: Lessons from an Urban District. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Soloway, E. (1993). "Should We Teach Students to Program?" from Communications of the ACM. October, V. 36, No. 10.
Taulbee Report Survey. (2001). "2000-2001 CRA Taulbee Survey." www.cra.org/statistics/home.html
Tomas Rivera Policy Papers. Digital Stepping Stones. http://www.trpi.org/dss/index.htm
Warschauer, M. (2000). "Technology and School reform: a view from both sides of the track." www.gse.uci.edu/markw/reform.html.
Warshauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (2001). School investments in instructional technology (No. 8). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
Anderson, R. E., & Ronnkvist, A. (1999). The presence of computers in American schools. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
Anyon, J. (1995). Social class and the hidden curriculum. Rereading America, 45-60.
Apple, M. W. (1998). Teaching and technology: The hidden effects of computers on teachers and students. In L. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities (pp. 314-336). New York: State University of New York Press.
Barron, L. C., & Goldman, E. S. (1994). Integrating technology with teacher preparation. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind the Promise (pp. 81-110). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Becker, H. (2000). Subject and teacher objectives for computer-using classes by school socio-economic status. Irvine, CA: CRITO.
Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use (No. 1). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
Becker, H. J. (2000a). Findings from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing Survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51).
Becker, H. J. (2000b). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44-75.
Becker, H. J. (2001, April, 2001). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, OR.
Becker, H. J., Wong, Y., & Ravitz, J. L. (1999). Teacher and teacher-direction student use of computers and software (No. 3). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Burbules, N. (1998). Rhetorics of the Web: Hyperreading and critical literacy. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to Screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 102-122). London: Routledge.
Burbules, N., & Callister, T. (2000). Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
California Department of Education. (2002). California's academic content standards: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved October 15, 2002, from www.ose.ca.gov/saa/standards-Q_A.html
California Technology Assistance Project. (2002). Summary of statewide results from the 2002 California school technology survey. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
Castells, M. (1999). The informational city is a dual city: can it be reversed? In D. Schon, B. Sanyal & W. Mitchell (Eds.), High Technology and Low Income Communities (pp. 25-43). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cattagni, A., & Westat, E. F. (2001). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2000. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (1996). The role of online communications in schools: A national study. Peabody, MA: Center for Applied Special Technology.
Charney, D. (2001). The effect of hypertext on processes of reading and writing. In E. Cushman, E. R. Kintgen, B. M. Kroll & M. Rose (Eds.), Literacy: A Critical Sourcebook (pp. 85-104). Boston: Bedford/St. Martins.
Collins, A., Hawkins, J., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1993). Three different views of students: The role of technology in assessing student performance. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 205-217.
Commission on Technology in Learning. (2003). California K-12 Education Technology Master Plan - draft. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. (1999). Being fluent with information technology. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.
Crawford, D. B. a. R. (2000). The digital divide. New York: TV Books.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cuban, L. (1993). Computers meet classroom: classroom wins. Teachers College Record, 95(2), 185-210.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Access to quality teaching: An analysis of inequality in California's public schools. Retrieved October 21, 2002, 2002, from www.decentschools.org
David, J. L. (1994). Realizing the promise of technology: A policy perspective. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind the Promise (pp. 169-190). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Dewey, J. (1900). The school and society (3 ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.
diSessa, A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Doherty, K. M., & Orlofsky, G. F. (2001). Student survey says. Education Weekly, XX(35), 45-48.
Editorial Projects in Education. (2002). State data tables. Education Week, Technology Counts 2002: E-Defining Education, 21(35), 56.
Edwards, V. B. (2001). Technology counts 2001: The new divides. Education Weekly, XX(35), 106.
Finn, C. E., & Petrilli, M. J. (Eds.). (2000). The state of school standards 2000. Washington, D.C.: Thomas J. Fordham Foundation.
Harrington-Lueker, D. (1999). Making technology work in urban schools. Washington, D.C.: Education Writers Association.
Harris, L. (2002). A survey of the status of equality in public education in California. Retrieved November 1, 2002, from www.publicadvocates.org
Hawisher, G. E. (1988). Research update: Writing and word processing. Computers and Composition, 5(2).
Herman, J. L. (1994). Evaluating the effects of technology in school reform. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind the Promise (pp. 133-168). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates of the California Community Colleges, t. C. S. U., and the University of California;. (2002). Academic literacy: A statement of competencies expected of students entering California's public colleges and universities. Sacramento, CA.
Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Computers as cognitive tools. In D. H.
Jonassen (Ed.), Toward a scientific practice of education (pp. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.
Jones, S. (2002). The Internet goes to college. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life.
Kellner, D. (2001). Multiple literacies and critical pedagogy in a multicultural society. Retrieved November 12, 2001, 2000, from http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/courses/ed253a/dk/mlmc.htm
Kirkpatrick, H., & Cuban, L. (1998). Should we be worried? What the research says about gender differences in access, use, attitudes, and achievement with computers. Educational Technology(July-August, 1998), 56-61.
Knobel, M., Stone, L., & Warschauer, M. (2002). Technology and academic preparation: A comparative study. Irvine, CA: University of California Office of the President.
Koski, W. S. (2002). What educational resources do students need to meet California's Educational Content Standards? An analysis of California's educational content standards and their implications for basic educational conditions and resources. Retrieved October 21, 2002, from www.decentschools.org
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (1998, 1998). Critical literacy and new technologies. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Light, J. S. (2001). Rethinking the digital divide. Harvard Educational Review, 71(4), 709-733.
MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain't no makin' it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Margerum-Leys, J. (2002, April 1, 2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: An exploration of a theoretical model. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Margolis, J., & Fischer, A. (2001). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marx, L. (1999). Information technology in historical perspective. In D. A. Schon, B. Sanyal & W.
Mitchell (Eds.), High Technology and Low-Income Communities (pp. 131-148). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Means, B. (1994). Using technology to advance educational goals. In Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind the Promise (pp. 1-21). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C. C., Remz, A. R., et al. (1993). Using technology to support education reform. Washington, D.C.: Department of Education.
Means, B., Penuel, W. R., & Padilla, C. (2001). The connected school: Technology and learning in high school. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Meier, D. (2000). Will standards save public education? Boston: Beacon Press.
Mitchell, W. J. (1999). Equitable access to an on-line world. In D. Schon, B. Sanyal & W. Mitchell (Eds.), High Technology and Low Income Communities (pp. 161-162). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Educational Technology.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, (2001).
Noble, D. (1998). The regime of technology in education. In L. Beyer & M. Apple (Eds.), The Curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities (pp. 267-283). New York: State University of New York Press.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track : how schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Palumbo, D. B. (1990). Programming language / Problem-solving research: A review of relevant Issues. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 65-89.
Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Harvester & Wheatsheaf.
Pennington, M. C. (1993). Modeling the student writer's acquisition of word processing skills: The interaction of computer, writing, and language media. Computers and Composition, 9(4), 59-79.
Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between internet-savvy students and their schools. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. (1997). Report to the president on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington, DC.
Ravitch, J. L., Becker, H. J., & Wong, Y. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among U.S. teachers (No. 4). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
Reiser, B., Taback, I., Sandoval, W., Smith, B., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. (2002). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognitition and Instruction: 25 years of progress. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl aum.
Roberts, D. F. (2000). Children: The Internet and fun learning, from www.disney.go.com
Robins, K. W., Frank. (1999). Times of the technoculture: From the information society to the virtual life (1 ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
Ronnkvist, A., Dexter, S. L., & Anderson, R. E. (2000). Technology support: Its depth, breadth and impact in America's schools (No. 5). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
Roschelle, J., Kaput, J. J., & Troup, W. (2000). SimCalc: Acceleratomg students' engagement with mathematics of change. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics (pp. 47-75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Sax, L., Keup, J. R., Gilmartin, S. K., Stolzenberg, E. B., & Harper, C. (2002). Findings from the 2002 Administration of Your First College Year (YFCY) National Aggregates. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute.
Schofield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Schofield, J. W., & Davidson, A. L. (2002). Bringing the Internet to school: Lessons from an urban district. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sheingold, K., & Frederiksen, J. (1994). Using technology to support innovative assessment. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind the Promise (pp. 111-132). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Snyder, I. (1998). Page to screen. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. xx-xxxvi). London: Routledge.
Soloway, E. (1993). Should we teach students to program? Communications of the ACM, 36(10), 21-24.
Streibel, M. J. (1998). A critical analysis of three approaches to the use of computers in education. In L. E. Beyer & M. J. Apple (Eds.), The Curriculum: Problems, Politics, and Possibilities (pp. 284-313). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
The George Lucas Educational Foundation, Chen, M., & Armstrong, S. (Eds.). (2002). Edutopia: Success stories for learning in the digital age. San Francisco, CA: Jossy-Bass.
The National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
Toyama, Y., & Crawford, V. (2002, April, 2002). Assessment of student proficiency with educational technology: State of the states' large-scale technology proficiency assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Teacher use of computers and the Internet in public schools: National Center for Education Statistics.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). 2001 geography assessment: National Center for Education Statistics.
UCLA Library Instructional Services Advisory Committee. (2001). UCLA library information competence at UCLA: Report of a survey project. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA.
University of California Office of the President. (2003, May 13, 2002). Admission as a freshmen. Retrieved March 16, 2003, 2003, from http://www.ucop.edu/pathways/infoctr/introuc/fresh.html
Vahey, P., Enyedy, N., & Gifford, B. (2000). Learning probability through the use of collaborative, inquiry-based simulation environment. Journal of interactive learning research, 11(1), 51-84.
Warschauer, M. Dissection the digital divide: Access and stratification in the age of information.
Warschauer, M. (2000). Technology and school reform: A view from both sides of the track. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(4).
Warschauer, M. (2002). Educational technology in underserved communities: UC Irvine.
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social infusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Weglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Woodruff, E., Brett, C., & Chakravorty, M. (1998, April, 1998). A model of technology infusion for preservice teacher education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.